Here's my portfolio. Go ahead, take a look. It's the best 63 seconds you'll spend all day.
Pictures From Around The Room
I mentioned earlier that since I was having so much trouble getting my camera to work, I decided to take pictures with it whenever I could actually get it working - which is basically only in my room.
I've created a small gallery of the best of these. Alright, that's a lie, I've created a small gallery of all of these, there's only so many things to take a picture of in my room.
All of these pictures were taken either in the room at night or out my window during the day. You can click on an image to see it in higher resolution. It still shouldn't take that long to load. Enjoy. 

An old newspaper clipping from a London paper on my wall.

This is an old newspaper clipping from New York, entitled "View of Lake George, NY."

This one was taken last week. It's pretty heavily photoshopped.

A painting my aunt did. No one likes this painting but me.
A Series of Unlikely Events
Follow this:
I bought the car on Sunday, and arranged to pick it up today.
They did a full inspection on the car and gave it an 15-month NH inspection sticker yesterday. New Hampshire, remember, has one of the most intensive inspection processes in the entire Union.
They cleaned it and handed it over to me with twenty-day plates today.
The engine went before I even made it out of town. The car didn't even make it home.
Let me repeat that: My new car did not even make it back from the dealership.
A parts estimate currently ranges from $130 to $170, depending.
Screw this. I'm going to Jersey. Maybe it'll all be over.
By the way, my town flooded again last night. It was awesome.
Friends Don't Let Friends Buy Cameras From Friends
A friend of mine sold me a complete dud of a digital camera. It's a Canon Powershot A70 which I purchased from him for about $45, which is fifteen bucks more expensive than Ebay. But he was offering it, and I wanted a digital camera.
Let's pretend, for a moment, that you were the one who bought the camera. You're anxious to try it out, but when you turn it on, the screen is completely black. You might think that this is just the screen malfunctioning, but when you take a picture in this mode, you discover that your image looks like this:
Now, just as your seller (who will never be invited to your wedding or the bar mitzvahs of your children) explained to you, you hit your camera on the side. The screen gives you a couple different views of purple lines across a black screen, like so:
As you continue to pound the camera, you get your very own private and extremely frustrating performance of "Fantasia 2000." After seven or eight pounds, the camera turns off. You turn it back on and give it another try. A few pounds later, the screen shuts off off again.
Anywhere from seven to ten minutes later, a vague, purple-ish image appears on your screen. You excitedly snap a picture.
Not so good. You keep pounding. The screen switches back to black, to purple lines again, then back to the purple-lined image. Then it switches off again. You think you're back to square one, but you soon learn that - you're not! You're actually even further away! The camera begins to shut off every three or four pounds at this point.
Suddenly, though, the screen snaps into focus. A few short seconds later, you've taken your first real photograph.
Naturally, of course, whatever big event you were prepping the camera for documenting has long since past. So you're left to take pictures of whoever happens to be around, which is usually no one, because nobody hangs out with a guy pounding a camera for more than five minutes.
Therefore I'm launching a photo gallery called Pictures In And Around The Room. I'll post some up tomorrow sometime. It's a whole different school of photography: the ease of use of digital cameras with the set-up time of a 1920's film camera, except without hand-loading flash powder. Though I'm not opposed to it.
*Ah, a visual aid for those of us who can't imagine what a perfectly black rectangle looks like! Let it never be said that I don't have faith in my readers.
** Those two photos are at least 15 minutes apart. I can't tell the difference either.
Review: X-Men: The Last Stand
Directed By: Brett Ratner
Starring: Hugh Jackman, Halle Berry, Ian McKe... look, it's all the same people as the last two times, with a few notable exceptions that I'll get to.
Because I feel vaguely responsible to have some sort of journalistic integrity on this site I usually peruse Imdb's website about whatever movie I'm reviewing, if just so I get the names spelled right. Imagine my shock when I came across this little tidbit:
Instead we get Storm - Storm - being chosen by the usually brilliant Professor X (Patrick Stewart) as the new leader of the X-Men. Swell. Then again, there aren't a whole lot of X-Men to be leading anymore.
Let's sum up: at the end of X2, Jean Grey (Famke Janssen) is killed by a whole lot of water, but the movie characteristically ends with a bit of teaser - you see the outline of a phoenix gliding through the water, and the comic book nerd sitting alone behind you in the theatre* explained to no one in particular that she'd be coming back as Phoenix in the next movie. And she does.
X3 gets to this point quickly, I guess because everyone knows it's coming, so why the hell not? They quickly follow this up by killing off a major character so innocuously that, while I'm writing this, I'm still not absolutely sure that they're actually dead. This becomes a theme for the film. The film eliminates characters so quickly that by the time the final showdown arrives, five of the major players from X2's big ending heist are gone. And that's when they were all on the same team. In this standoff, this "last stand," the X-Men are only able to boast six members. And one of those, Shadowcat, is so bland that the current version (Ellen Page) is the third actress to have played her in these movies.** Explain again why Gambit couldn't fit into this movie?
I don't think Ratner - more on him later - realizes the damage this does to his movie. What makes these films work is the grating of these personalities against each other: Wolverine and Cyclops pissing each other off, Jean Grey playing the tortured muse for both of them, Rogue pining for Wolverine while Iceman fights for her attention, Professor X floating serenely above it all, Storm doing absolutely nothing of value. Instead we have Storm and Wolverine mildly annoying each other. This was the character development Berry signed on for?
Which isn't to say that I didn't enjoy X3. This is funny, because everyone that's written a review on the film has said exactly the same thing. There's too many flaws for a conscientious reviewer to look over all of them, but few people have walked out of the theatre feeling completely let down. Here's ten reasons why:
2. Kelsey Grammar and some yeoman's work by the make-up department have created something no one thought possible (seriously, no one did. We saw The Hulk): a Beast faithful to both his intelligent nature and ability to beat the snot out of anything that gets in his way. Plus, I got through the whole movie without finding a place to sneak a pop psychology joke, which I didn't expect to happen.
3. Stewart and Ian McKellen are now so fully enmeshed in their roles that one doesn't even blink at the idea of an 80-year-old man in a funny helmet picking on a bald guy in a wheelchair.
4. I'm always a fan of slapstick, and it does a heart good to see Juggernaut run into a wall and knock himself out. The sight of that is something that the comics could never match. Though, I will admit, it is former British soccer star Vinnie Jones, so I guess it's not that surprising.
5. Ratner's cast the two best young rising star actors into this film: emotional firecracker Page (Hard Candy) and the new Haley Joel Osment, Cameron Bright (
Birth, Godsend, Thank You For Smoking).6. It's twice as big as any other
X-Men movie, with twice as much going on, and still - the special effects are cleaner, the explosions bigger, every detail is taken care of. Bravo for being careful. Singer was still shooting scenes a month before the release date of X-Men.7. I understood when I paid admission I wasn't getting
La Dolce Vita. It was more fun than The Da Vinci Code or MI3, which is all I could have asked for.8. I didn't expect all those people to die or lose their powers, so you certainly showed up my expectations, Ratner. The
X-Men series had been averaging about one and a half deaths a movie: Toad and Mystique (sort of) in X-Men; Deathstrike and Jean Grey (sort of) in X2. This movie opens with a eight-year-old mutant trying to cut his own wings off. You're not messing around.9. Ratner, you might not be as good as Singer, but you're a whole lot more fun.
10.
And, if you made an X4, I'd go see it. Speaking of which, Berry says that her character deserves a sequel. How did you make it through this movie without throttling her? It's more than I could've done.Seriously, Ratner isn't my favorite - he's egotistical and brazen about how amazing he is, which considering the fact that this is the person who directed After The Sunset and Red Dragon, is a little presumptious. On the other hand, he did direct the Rush Hour movies, and X3 has that action/comedy type flair that so few directors can effectively handle. I don't think Singer can do that nearly as well, and I love my Brian Singer. On the other hand, Singer directed The Usual Suspects, so top that. That's a movie that has Stephen Baldwin in it and is awesome anyway.
To sum up: X3 is flawed and troublesome and expresses its emotions with the subtlety of a middle school production of The Tempest (or of anything, really). It's a Greek tragedy in leather. It's definitely worth seeing.
Three and A Half Stars out of Five
* It might have been me, but it probably wasn't.
** Though Ellen Page is awesome.









